Skip to content
Lambert Consulting

Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Functional Offering

Results first. Infrastructure second.

An assistant for your documents, end-of-line verification, a platform for multiple services. Where artificial intelligence is applied is determined by your data, not by a catalog.

See all solutions
4Comparing Architectures, Criterion by Criterion
2 fieldsSoftware and hardware under one roof
All Use CasesUse cases first, technology last

Our first department

This is what needs to work every morning.

Your servers, your workstations, your phone systems, and your identities. The foundation that no one notices as long as it holds, but that everyone notices the day it fails.

View the department
Multi-siteNational and international projects
3Branches in French-speaking Switzerland
View our client projectsCase Studies and References
Let us know how you're doingGetting a quote is free

How We Work

A piece of advice, not a sales pitch.

Our approach is consultative: we tell you what we think, even when it’s not in our best interest. That’s what makes projects succeed.

About Us
1995First project, using Microsoft SMS
Family-orientedOn a human scale and sustainable

Our Branches

Vaud, headquarters9 Avenue des Baumettes, 1020 Renens+41 21 806 37 15
Valais134 Oscar-Bider Street, 1950 Sion+41 27 552 00 22
FribourgChemin de Montmoirin 18a, 1618 Châtel-Saint-Denis+41 26 322 59 05
Monday through Friday8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Contact UsFirst 30-minute consultation, with no obligation
A group of consultants standing and talking in an office

Artificial Intelligence / Architectures

What Architecture Should You Choose for Your Artificial Intelligence Project?

At Microsoft, on-site, in a hybrid setting, or next to the machine: first the criteria, then a tentative answer.

The question we’re asked is, “ cloud or local?” It’s almost always the wrong question. The right questions are: Where is your data, who has permission to access it, how quickly must a response be provided, and what happens when the connection goes down? Seven questions are enough to guide the way, and one possible answer is to build nothing at all.

Four architectural approaches, one point of contact We implement all four. That’s what allows us to advise you based on your specific needs rather than on what we can sell.
An estimate, not a quote The questionnaire provides guidance. The sizing, however, is based on measurements taken from your actual data.
"Nothing to build" is a solution When Copilot in your licenses is enough, we’ll let you know. An infrastructure project isn’t an end in itself.

Three Mistakes People Make Before Writing the First Line of Code

They aren't technical. They have to do with the order in which the questions are asked, and the choice of architecture almost always comes too early.

01

Deciding on accommodations before knowing the details

We tend to choose “on-premises” out of caution or “online” out of habit, before even looking into where the documents are stored, who has access to them, and which ones are actually not confidential at all. The location is determined by the data, not the other way around.

Sensitivity is determined on a document-by-document basis.

02

Count the servers, forget about operations

A platform on your premises is a server with graphics processors, but above all, it’s someone who updates the models, monitors costs, and steps in on a Sunday. That position doesn’t appear on the hardware quote.

Rent for the space is paid monthly, not all at once.

03

Believing that online services are always cheaper

For low volumes, yes. Once you exceed a certain number of requests per day, or when millions of pages need to be re-read each month, local processing becomes less expensive. This threshold is calculated over a three-year period; it can’t be guessed.

The tipping point exists, and it can be quantified.

Four Ways to Implement the Same Solution

Whether it’s an assistant for your documents, invoice processing, or end-of-line inspection, there are four possible approaches. Each has its advantages, limitations, and situations where we recommend it. The detailed pages cover the rest.

OnlineAt Microsoft

This argues in favor of

The data is already in Microsoft 365. The features come with the licenses. No hardware to buy, nothing to maintain—a first implementation in just a few weeks.

What limits

Cost is based on usage and increases with volume. The service must be able to process the data. Latency depends on the connection.

When we offer it

Assistants in Teams, search for SharePoint, email filtering, and customer service. Everything that’s already available in your tenant.

On-premisesAt your facility

This argues in favor of

Nothing leaves the premises: not the documents, not the requests, and not the template. The cost per request becomes negligible once the equipment has been paid for. Large volumes remain on your premises.

What limits

A server with graphics processors, its power supply, its cooling system, and the operations that go along with it. Models are evolving quickly; we have to keep up with them.

When we offer it

Confidential data sets, source code, regulated data, large volumes of documents, or a contract that prohibits the use of an online service.

HybridPartly at Microsoft, partly at your location

This argues in favor of

Identity, the " Teams ," and the interface remain with Microsoft; document search, sensitive data, and inference remain on your premises. The best of both worlds—when it’s properly separated.

What limits

Two locations to operate, a border to secure over the long term, and a connection between the two that has become critical.

When we offer it

The most common scenario: an assistant in Teams whose corpus and model never leave datacenter. Or the processing of documents where the sensitive portions remain on-site.

EdgeNext to the machine

This argues in favor of

The decision is made on the spot, in a matter of milliseconds, with or without a connection. The images and measurements do not travel over any network.

What limits

Rugged equipment in a harsh environment, remote management, and templates that need to be updated at each site.

When we offer it

Cameras on a line, sensors on equipment, industrial sites, or remote locations that cannot rely on the Internet.

And when there are multiple projects

The Enterprise Platform

With the third prototype, the question changes: it is no longer “where does this case work,” but “what common, governed, and supervised infrastructure will multiple services share?” This is a fifth answer.

View the enterprise platform

The criteria, line by line

Eight criteria, four models, and what each box means to you. There is no “winning” column: the one that carries the most weight in your situation is the deciding factor.

CriterionAt MicrosoftAt your facilityHybridNext to the machine
Data SensitivityProcessed in the Microsoft cloud; data location in Switzerland to be verifiedNothing comes outSensitive information remains on your premisesNothing leaves the site
Data volumePay-as-you-go: increases with volumeUnlimited once the equipment has been paid forThe bulk of it remains localProcessed on-site as it flows
LatencyDepends on the connection; a few hundred millisecondsInternal NetworkDepending on the party being askedA few milliseconds
ConnectivityAlways EssentialInternet-independentThe connection between the two becomes criticalContinue when the connection is lost
Inference CostThe cheapest option for small volumesThe lowest price beyond a certain number of requestsThe threshold is calculated based on the local portionEquipment sized for the site
IntegrationsNatives with Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, Power PlatformTo be integrated with your systemsBoth, with a line to holdToward Industrial Systems and theERP
Day-to-Day OperationsPowered by MicrosoftEntirely yours, or entrustedSharedRemotely, site by site
Time frame for the first caseA few weeksA few months, including equipmentAccording to the local partyDepending on the location and the sensors

The mechanisms described here are taken from Microsoft documentation and Dell Technologies, and are double-checked before each proposal. No prices are listed here: they change every quarter, and a pricing error is the kind of mistake that makes people stop trusting everything else.

Seven questions, one suggested answer

Answer as you would during an initial meeting. The result provides guidance; it doesn’t define anything: it identifies the architecture we should examine first, the pitfall associated with it, and the page to read next.

Question 1 of 7

What is your use case?

Question 2 of 7

Where is the data located?

Question 3 of 7

Can data leave your infrastructure?

Question 4 of 7

What volume needs to be processed?

Question 5 of 7

Is a real-time response necessary?

Question 6 of 7

Does the system need to work without an Internet connection?

Question 7 of 7

Do you already have servers with graphics processing units?

Preliminary response

Answer the seven questions

The conclusion becomes clear once all seven answers have been provided. It identifies the architecture we should study first, the first pitfall, and the page to read next.

Identify the use case first

Until the use case is defined, no architecture can be chosen: the solution is derived from the problem, never the other way around. A half-day with the business stakeholders is often enough to identify three candidates and narrow it down to one.

The first pitfall: starting with the technology you want to try.

Identify the right use cases

Next to the machine: Edge AI

Without an Internet connection, or when a decision must be made in a matter of milliseconds on the machines, processing must take place on-site. This requires robust on-site equipment, managed remotely, and models updated from the central office when a connection is available.

The first pitfall: underestimating the environment—dust, heat, a lack of IT staff—and the cost of updating each site.

View the Edge AI Architecture

On-premises: on-premises artificial intelligence

Your data cannot leave the system: the template, documents, and calculations all run on your datacenter. Regulatory requirements take precedence over everything else; they are the only non-negotiable factor.

The first pitfall: buying the server before deciding who will operate the platform, update the models, and monitor costs.

View Private Architecture

An enterprise platform

Whether it’s multiple use cases, high volumes, or existing computing infrastructure: the question is no longer “where does this use case run?” but “what shared infrastructure will multiple departments use?” Governance, monitoring, and costs are decided once and for all.

The first pitfall: letting each department build its own prototype, only to end up with four platforms and no operational use.

View the enterprise platform

Hybrid: The interface is at Microsoft; the data is on your premises

Some data can be moved off-site, while other data cannot, or it may be distributed across multiple locations. Identity, Teams , and the interface remain with Microsoft; sensitive or large-volume data stays on your premises. This is the most common setup we implement.

The first pitfall: a blurred line between the two, which shifts as demands change and ultimately fails to protect anyone.

See Hybrid Architecture

At Microsoft, online—and often, what you already have is enough

Your data resides in Microsoft 365, it can be processed there, and there’s no need for a real-time response. There’s no reason for an infrastructure project here. Copilot within your licenses, an agent Copilot Studio , or a service Azure will handle this—provided you first clean up the access rights.

The first pitfall: opening a wizard on a SharePoint system whose shared folders have never been reviewed. The wizard doesn’t create leaks; it reveals the ones that already existed.

View Architecture Online
Discussing this result

The result is for reference only. The final decision will be based on your actual data, your integrations, and your operating budget during your assessment.

What Seven Questions Cannot Decide

There are three things to consider when building your assessment, based on your numbers. Ignoring them is the surest way to make choices that look good on paper but don't work in the machine room.

Integrations

Where are the systems that consume the output located?

An assistant who needs to open a file in Dynamics 365, post toERP , or send an alert to Teams drives the architecture toward the location where these systems reside. The location of the data alone is not enough.

The cost over three years

The threshold beyond which your office space becomes less expensive

Number of requests per day, pages reviewed per month, minutes of voice recording: these three figures, when compared to the cost of equipment and its operation, establish a threshold. We’ll calculate it right here in front of you.

The Farm

Who's in charge of the platform on Sundays?

Any infrastructure on your premises or at a site requires someone to update, monitor, and maintain it. We can handle that; it just needs to be decided and costed out before you make a purchase.

Let's talk about your architecture

Your responses, your real-world data, and a choice that stands the test of time

Send us your seven answers and two orders of magnitude: the number of documents or queries, and what must not be disclosed. We’ll get back to you with the architecture we would consider, the cost threshold, and what would need to be measured to validate it.

What we offer is a meeting with the engineers who will do the work. The threshold calculation and detailed design are part of the first- assessment. The discussion that precedes them, however, is free of charge.

Three branches in French-speaking Switzerland

Renens, Sion, Châtel-Saint-Denis

Microsoft Solutions Partner and Dell Technologies Gold Partner : we have expertise in all four architectures, and that’s what makes consulting possible.

Renens VD +41 21 806 37 15
Sion VS +41 27 552 00 22
Châtel-Saint-Denis FR +41 26 322 59 05