Skip to content
Lambert Consulting

Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Functional Offering

Results first. Infrastructure second.

An assistant for your documents, end-of-line verification, a platform for multiple services. Where artificial intelligence is applied is determined by your data, not by a catalog.

See all solutions
4Comparing Architectures, Criterion by Criterion
2 fieldsSoftware and hardware under one roof
All Use CasesUse cases first, technology last

Our first department

This is what needs to work every morning.

Your servers, your workstations, your phone systems, and your identities. The foundation that no one notices as long as it holds, but that everyone notices the day it fails.

View the department
Multi-siteNational and international projects
3Branches in French-speaking Switzerland
View our client projectsCase Studies and References
Let us know how you're doingGetting a quote is free

How We Work

A piece of advice, not a sales pitch.

Our approach is consultative: we tell you what we think, even when it’s not in our best interest. That’s what makes projects succeed.

About Us
1995First project, using Microsoft SMS
Family-orientedOn a human scale and sustainable

Our Branches

Vaud, headquarters9 Avenue des Baumettes, 1020 Renens+41 21 806 37 15
Valais134 Oscar-Bider Street, 1950 Sion+41 27 552 00 22
FribourgChemin de Montmoirin 18a, 1618 Châtel-Saint-Denis+41 26 322 59 05
Monday through Friday8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Contact UsFirst 30-minute consultation, with no obligation
Business Solutions · Microsoft Power Platform

Copilot Studio

An agent is a digital employee: a scope of responsibility, permissions, and a supervisor.

You don’t just “assign customer service” to an agent. You assign them a routine, tedious, and verifiable task —and you spell out in black and white what they know, what they’re allowed to do, when they hand off the task, and who reviews it. The rest isn’t about technology; it’s about organization.

It responds to your documentsYours, not those from the rest of the internet—and only the ones you give it
He takes action; he doesn't just talkOpen a ticket, check a deadline, schedule an appointment
He passes the batonWith the entire conversation, as soon as he steps outside his perimeter

Three tasks that no one should have had to do by hand

They have one thing in common: they come up often, the answer already exists somewhere, and they take up the time of people who are paid to do other things.

01

The same request, three hundred times a year

A request for access, a certificate, a duplicate invoice. The form exists, the rule is known, and yet someone is processing them one by one.

Three hundred times fifteen minutes: ten days of work per year.

02

One in four customer questions has the same answer

Where is my order? What are your delivery times? How do I cancel? The answer is in writing, it's accurate, and it's updated every day.

Meanwhile, requests that require human attention are waiting.

03

Human Resources answers phone calls based on what's on the intranet

The vacation policy, the procedure for obtaining a certificate, the reimbursement form. Everything is posted online. No one can find it.

A document that cannot be found does not exist, regardless of its quality.

What an agent does—and what he doesn't do

Six points, stated without fanfare. The word “intelligence” does not appear even once: what matters is the scope.

Reply

On your documents—and only yours

Catalog, procedures, knowledge base, internal regulations. It cites its sources, which makes it possible to verify—and correct—the document rather than the agent.

Take Action

Do, not just talk

Open a ticket, check a delivery time onERP, book a time slot, or update an address. That’s what sets a helpful agent apart from a chatty search engine.

Step Down

Knowing When to Stop

Two unsatisfactory responses, an angry remark, a complaint, a request not listed in the catalog: he forwards the entire conversation, not just a case number.

To Be Everywhere

In " Teams," on the website, in the contact center

The same agent, the same scope, the same rights—regardless of where the agent is queried. It is created only once.

Testing Oneself

A weekly chart, not a printout

Questions received, answers provided, human review rate, topics on which it fails. It is this last figure that helps improve your documents.

Stay on track

He doesn't make up his own rights

He sees only what the person speaking to him sees—and nothing more. An employee who does not have access to a file will not be granted access simply by asking the agent nicely.

A staff member's job description

This isn't a technical diagram, and that's by design. An agent is managed just like any other employee: we document what it knows, what it can do, when it stops, and who reviews it. Here is the profile of an agent we often use.

Agent: "Where is my order?" Available on the website and at the contact center

What He Knows

The product catalog, the 180 published and validated articles in the knowledge base, the terms and conditions, and the delivery times provided by the carrier.

  • And the order status, displayed in real time in theERP
  • Nothing else: neither shared leadership nor internal communication

What he is allowed to do

Three actions, listed here—and not one more.

  • Provide the order status to the person who placed it
  • Open a claim file, with the conversation attached
  • Send a duplicate invoice to the registered address

When he steps down

Immediately, and without trying again.

  • Two responses in a row deemed unsatisfactory
  • An angry remark, a threat, a mention of a lawyer
  • Any questions regarding pricing, discounts, or cancellations
  • Anything that's not in the catalog

Who supervises him?

A specific person, not “the IT department.” That person receives a spreadsheet every Monday and decides on the corrections.

  • Questions received, answers provided, reviewed by a human
  • The ten topics he failed on: that means ten articles to write

A sheet like this fits on one page and can be reviewed in three minutes by a department manager. An agent who does not have their own copy is not ready to be put on duty, regardless of how well they perform the demonstration.

The first three agents who are making progress

All three share the same characteristics: the task is routine, the solution already exists, and the results are verifiable. That’s what makes them reliable—and profitable as early as the first quarter.

On the public website

The agent who answers pre-sales questions

Lead times, compatibility, delivery terms, availability. He consults the catalog and knowledge base, and creates a request as soon as a genuine need arises.

It attracts viewers at 10 p.m., who never call back the next day.

At Microsoft Teams, internally

The Administrative Affairs Officer

Vacation, expense reports, equipment, access. It responds to your requests, and it forwards the request to the appropriate department when the response isn't sufficient.

It frees up the time the HR department spends repeating what's already written.

At the contact center

The agent who lays the groundwork

He identifies the caller, understands the reason for the call, resolves simple issues, and forwards the others— using what he has already learned—so the customer doesn't have to repeat themselves.

It reduces the number of calls without compromising perceived quality.

What we do, and in what order

Building the agent is the quick part. The second step is the one that takes time, and it’s the one that determines whether the agent’s answer is right or wrong.

01

Choosing the Right First Task

Three criteria, and all three must be met: the task is frequent, it is tedious, and its result is verifiable. If any one of the three is missing, we choose something else.

We start with your actual volumes, not a list of ideas.

What You Receive Candidate tasks, sorted by volume and risk The one we’re selecting, and why the others are on hold The expected benefit, quantified in hours
02

The Source of Truth, and How It Is Organized

That’s the real issue. An agent only knows what he’s given: if your procedures exist in three versions across two different shared folders, he’ll give the wrong answer with the same confidence as if it were the right one.

We identify the authoritative documents, set aside the others, and establish a process to keep them up to date.

What You Receive The list of authoritative sources and those that are excluded The update process, with a designated person in charge Documents corrected where they contradicted each other A summary of access rights, prior to release
03

Shares and Rights

What the agent is authorized to trigger, and on what data. The agent sees what the person they are speaking to sees—and nothing more—and every action is logged.

What You Get Authorized, listed, and individually tested actions The permissions model, aligned with the company’s A record of every action, available for review
04

The Shift to Human-Centered Approaches, and Safeguards

Written before the system goes live, not after the first incident: what triggers the transfer, to whom, and how. And what the agent will never say, no matter what the question.

What You Receive Proven, written transfer guidelines Prohibited topics, and how to respond if the other party persists Documented attempts at misuse
05

Monitoring — An Agent Reviews Their Work

Every week: what it received, how it responded, and what was handled by a human. The tasks it fails at are the list of documents to be written.

Without this feedback loop, an employee gradually loses effectiveness as the company changes.

What You Receive The weekly report, reviewed with the designated manager Corrections made, highlighted New topics to assign or remove

How long, honestly?

For the first agent. The second one costs much less, because the organizing has already been done.

The scenario: a single agent, one task, two sources of documentation, two or three actions to trigger, and a business manager available half a day per week. Well-organized documentation cuts the second phase in half; scattered documentation doubles it.

1week

Selecting a Task

Volumes, risk, expected return. The job description is provided here.

2 to5 weeks

The Source of Truth

Organizing documents. By far, the task that takes the most time.

2 to 3weeks

Construction and Testing

Actions, rights, safeguards, and misuse tests.

2weeks

Supervised Opening

First internally, then to a segment of the public, and finally to everyone.

Seven to eleven weeks for the first agent to go live. A second agent based on the same documentation: three to four weeks. That’s why we never judge profitability based on the first one.

What You Need to Know
An agent connected to disorganized documents responds "false" with the confidence of a computer program.

Organization is the goal. The agent is the result.

This is the opposite of what a demonstration promises, where an agent can be set up in ten minutes to work with a selected set of documents. At your company, that set of documents doesn't exist yet.

A wrong answer is more costly than no answer at all

A customer who gets no response will call back. A customer who receives the wrong answer will act on that answer—and you’re the one who’ll bear the consequences.

The benefit remains, even if the agent is abandoned

The cleanup effort benefits research, customer service, the onboarding of new hires, and Copilot. That’s what makes this project low-risk: the time-consuming part is useful anyway.

What You Need to Know Before Signing

Five points that determine both the budget and the schedule.

You pay as you go, and that changes the design

An agent uses credits with each exchange. It is not a subscription per user: it is a counter, and it increases as the agent becomes more successful.

The practical result is this: we don’t deploy the agent everywhere as a matter of principle. We deploy it where the task occurs frequently and where the benefit is measurable—and we monitor usage just as we monitor a phone bill.

What Is the Responsibility of an Agent, and What Is the Responsibility of a Development

Responding to documents and triggering three simple actions: that's an agent. Orchestrating a seven-step process with business calculation rules and hierarchical validations: that's an application.

We'll be honest with you, even when the answer is "this isn't the agent you need."

Your access rights will be put to the test

An agent doesn't create leaks—it reveals the ones that already existed. Sharing information openly across the entire company becomes a response for the entire company, and this usually becomes apparent on the very first day.

That is why the state of rights is part of the second phase, before any opening.

You remain responsible for the response

What an agent says is binding on the company, just as if an employee had said it. Hence the written safeguards, the record of every exchange, and the rule that prohibits discussing prices, discounts, and cancellations from the outset.

The first agent isn't profitable, but the third one is

The first one pays for organizing the documents and setting up the monitoring system. The subsequent ones reuse all of that and are built in three to four weeks.

To judge the process based solely on the first agent is like judging a workshop by its first piece.

Continued

Tell us which task tires you out

The one that keeps coming up, for which the answer already exists, and which takes up the time of someone who is paid to do something else. We’re back with a scope, a workload, a timeline, and a job description for a staff member.

Preparing a proposal is free. Design studies and audits are included in the scope of work. Three agencies: Renens, Sion , and Châtel-Saint-Denis  ; a Microsoft partner for sixteen consecutive years.

A Test to Take Before Calling Us

Search for one of your procedures

Pick an internal policy that everyone is familiar with—vacation time, expense reports— and look it up using your own tools, just as a new employee would.

If you find two different versions—or none at all—you've just figured out, in five minutes, what your first agent would have said.